Wednesday, July 1, 2026

US License Plates – Best & Worst

My wife and I live in North Carolina but have a summer home in New Hampshire. So, twice yearly, we make a pilgrimmage from one to the other.

It’s a pretty, but rather boring ride. So, one thing we like to do to make it a little more interesting is to see how many different state license plates we can spot. We’ve never quite reached forty.

One thing this game has helped me develop is an appreciation for the different plate designs out there. So, what I thought I’d do is call out some of my faves – and least faves – for all 50 states.

Now, I must admit, this is not as easy as it sounds. There are so many different designs out there now. To narrow it down a little, I looked only at the current design, at least according to worldlicenseplates.com.

The bad ones are, of course, the most fun. So, let’s start with those.


Most Disappointing – Wyoming

Wyoming has two absolutely killer state symbols. The first is the cowboy on a bucking bronco. It dates back to1918, has been used on the license plate since 1936, and is featured by the Univ. of Wyoming as well.

The second is the outline of a bison, which features prominently on their state flag:

Of course, the current license plate is simply trying to use both. In theory, it’s not a bad idea. In practice, though, it’s just too much, and is simply trying too hard. One or the other would have been fine.

Compounding the issue is how they’ve rendered the bison. Once again, the grey on black is a legitimate attempt to create a background. To me, though, it just muddies the whole thing up.

Just stick with the cowboy, Wyoming.


Chattiest – Washington DC

I get it. There are almost 700,000 people in DC, none of whom get a vote in the US Congress. Wyoming and Vermont both have fewer people, but get 4 senators and 2 representatives between them. It just ain’t right.

That said, this is almost 40 letters. It’s a short novel! Interestingly, it was once a little shorter.

I guess some genius thought that this could have been misconstrued as being in favor of taxation without representation.

Before they got all political, DC had previous mottos with innocuous things like “Celebrate and Discover,” “A Capital City,” and “Nation’s Capital.” If they can’t come up with something a little more punchy for their current motto, I suggest going back to one of these.

The rest of the design is nice and clean. I also like the little symbol in the middle. It’s from the flag, which is in turn from the coat of arms of George Washington.

I’m sure George agrees with the sentiment. I can’t imagine even he, though, would approve of the prolixity.


Oddest Motto – Idaho

Just think if other states had gone with this theme. For Georgia, perhaps, you’d have “Famous Peaches.” For Maryland, “Famous Crabs.” Maine? How about “Famous Lobstahs”?

Idaho does, in fact, grow a lot of potatoes. They’re number one in the country, and produce about 140M hundredweight per year. According to Google, the state has “perfect growing conditions: mineral-rich volcanic soil, pure mountain-fed water, and a high-desert climate with warm, sunny days and cool nights.”

I kind of like the rest of the design though. It’s a landscape (as are many these days), but done in a nice, subtle way. I also like the red, white, and blue combo. I’m not sure what other states do that.

That design goes all the way back to 1991. Before that, it was pretty much just “Famous Potatoes.”


Most Obscure

What the heck is it? Is that a lightning bolt over there on the left? Maybe a farm right under it? Some clouds? I tell ya, ya got me.

The light grey on white isn’t helping here. You’re gonna need a little more color contrast to pick this all out. But that would probably make the actual license plate number a challenge to read. Perhaps if the background just wasn’t so complex.

Leaving aside what exactly is going on here, the plate is actually very elegant. It certainly beats previous efforts, which range from way too basic:

To positively garish:

So, what the heck is that thing anyway? It’s actually supposed to represent the “Genius of Creative Energy,” from the State Capitol building.

Now, all by itself, that is kinda cool (though a tad obscure). As a background for a license plate? Not so much. Hey, how about some corn?


Busiest - Illinois 

Well, at least I can make out what’s what here. Let’s see … Looks like we’ve got Lincoln, and the state capitol, and the Chicago skyline. Is that a farm in the middle? And do I spot a kitchen sink?

Seeing as we’ve already got Lincoln in the motto, perhaps we could nix ol’ Honest Abe from the design. That still leaves us with an imaginary skyline that features 2 cities and rural farmland as well.

An older design, though with its own issues, at least kept it to just Abe.


Most Boring – Delaware

There was a time when every license plate looked like this.

Most states, however, moved on. Not Delaware though. Yup, things are a little slow in the ol’ First State.


Now, would you believe Delaware offers their drivers an even more boring alternative? Yup, this one is made of porcelain or stainless steel and replicates a design from 1942.

Ever wonder why Delaware’s the ”first state”? Simple – it was the first state to ratify the Constitution.


So, whence all the bad? Well, a lot of these are designed by committee – in particular, by a committee of politicians. So, no graphic design skills required. Instead, substitute special interests, an inability to make decisions, no decisive leadership, and trying to make everyone happy. Et voila!

That said, there is still some hope. Let’s take a look at the best the country has to offer.

 

Nicest Lettering - California 

Typography tends to play next to no role in license plate design. If you can get some state to consider a serif font and mixed case, you’re really on the cutting edge. Throw in some italics, and you’re definitely blowing some minds out there.

And then along comes California. First, the design is pretty much all about the typography. There’s no state symbols – no peaches, no oranges, no Lincolns, no bison, no skylines, no scenic vistas …

Second, the typography conveys an incredible amount. Just based on the typography alone, the Golden State appears to be a fun, informal, modern, and exciting place.

Oddly, the type face is actually called “Rage Italic.” Not sure where that came from.

Interestingly, two states have also attempted something similar. One, though, is totally lost in the busy background:

The other seems to be almost an exact copy of California’s, but utterly fails in saying anything about the state.


Prettiest - Mississippi

Speaking of typography …  That “Mississippi” at the top is certainly unique, and very decorative to boot. Would you believe, though, that it’s been around since 1981?

Add that to the very nice magnolia blossom in the middle, and you have a design that’s rather elegant, almost feminine. Interestingly, that blossom has been around even longer, dating back to 1977. Those previous designs, though, were rather weak:


Most Classic - Wyoming

It’s a pretty basic idea. Is your state long and narrow? Well, why not incorporate it in what is basically the long and narrow shape of a license plate? Tennessee, Nebraska, and Kansas have all done something similar.

Montana, though, actually started doing this all the way back in 1933:

Now, that simple, basic idea did get a little obscured over the years:

The only beef I have with the current plate is the motto. Who ever heard of that? “Big Sky Country” is much more well known, and fitting.


Coolest - South Dakota

Yeah, I’ve already dinged this one, for the state name being very hard to pick out. That said, maybe Mt. Rushmore is enough to let you know. Perhaps if they got rid of the motto and made the state name a little bigger …  It’s actually pretty lame (“Great Faces, Great Places”), so why not?

Also, this design is so distinctive, it’s really hard to take away from the overall effect. I don’t think any other state even tried something like this. Everything else is just simple illustrations, at best.

In fact, I’m not sure there are any other state icons that would lend themselves so well to this approach. Remember, it’s gonna have to be horizontal, simple, and iconic.

By the way, it was a long and winding road to get here. Previous attempts were no way near as successful:



Monday, June 29, 2026

NHL Draft Funny Names

I don’t know much about hockey. I do know a funny name when I see one though.

In increasing order of funniness, may I present:


Cullen McCrate – #216 / Bruins / D / US

Commit to Michigan State


Alexander Command – #12 / Devils / C / Sweden 

Not to be confused with the male model of the same name

The male model of the same name


Daxon Rudolph – #4 / Sabres / D / Canada

“Rudolph is stick on puck” (ESPN]


Maddox Dagenais – #16 / Blues / C / Canada

Father Pierre played in NHL


Markus Ruck – #39 / Penguins / C / Canda

Brother Liam drafted #22


Alan Shaikhlislamov – #55 / Flames / RW / Russia

Has played for Ufa Tolpar & Ufa Salavat Yulayev


Parker Von Richter – #111 / Penguins / D / Canada

“Penguins get another overage defenseman” [Pittsburgh Sports]


Patriks Plumins – #114 / Maple Leafs / G / Latvia

Last name actually spelled “PlÅ«miņš”


Carson Carels – #6 / Flames / D / Canada

“a future captain and foundational player for a Stanley Cup contender” [ESPN]


Cooper Cleaves – #93 / Canadiens / D / US

Dartmouth student


Alofa Tunoa Ta'Amu – #199 / Jets / D / US

Father played in the NFL


Tobias Tvrznik – #127 / Avalanche / G / Czechia

6’4”


Timofei Runtso – #57 / Canadiens / D / US

Student at Miami Univ. (of Ohio)


Gleb Pugachyof – #26 / Canadiens / RW / Russia

“a freight train on skates” [ESPN]


Wiggo Sorensson – #61 / Hurricanes / C / Sweden

“An under-scouted sleeper from Sweden's lower ranks” [Hockey News]

 


Viggo Bjorck – #8 / Jets / C / Sweden

Not to be confused with the male model of the same name

The male model of the same name


Brody Pepoy – #169 / Maple Leafs / RW / US

Student at Lindenwood Univ. (Missouri)


Juho Piiparinen – #29 / Golden Knights / D / Finland

Father Jarkko was drafted (#212) in 1984


Doman Szongoth - #156 / Sabres / C / Hungary

3rd generation of his family to play professional hockey


Vilho Vanhatalo - #168 / Panthers / RW / Finland

6’4”




Tuesday, June 23, 2026

Classic Soccer Kits

Well, all I’m doing is sitting on the coach watching the World Cup these days. So, why not another soccer post?

So, how do you define a “classic” soccer kit? Well, how about one that hasn’t changed in 50 years?

I’m listing these in reverse order of how long they’ve been around. I’m showing two kits – from the first year & the current year.

BTW, I’m not sweating the small stuff like trim or even socks. Also, if there are a few years here and there with some differences, that’s okay too. Finally, home kits only – away and alternate kits are just way too crazy.


Poland – 1974

Nice job reflecting the flag


Iran – 1970

Boring? Yes. Consistent? Pretty much. There were a few years where they repped the flag (1986, 1990) and one where they channeled Italy/Japan (1971). I say, go with the flag!


New Zealand – 1960s

Hey, is there some copying going on here? Interestingly, NZ’s colors are traditionally all black (their rugby team is called the All Blacks). Because, however, soccer refs typically wore that, they had to go with something different. 1981 was the sole anomaly, with the team wearing black shorts.


Iraq – 1964

Definitely some copying. Iraq had a number of years where they sported some green (1993, 2020-24), and one where they were all baby blue (1986). Neither of those colors really make sense here. How about something with the flag colors?


Denmark – 1964

Classic representation of the national colors. There have been a couple of years (4 times since 2000) where they went with all red. That’s not bad, but I do prefer the red-white-red.


Australia – 1960

Wait, what do green and yellow have to do with Australia? Supposedly, they’re drawn from nature. The yellow represents sunshine, beaches, grain, the golden fleece (of wool), and the wattle (the “national floral emblem”). The green stands for forest, pastures, and the bush. Supposedly, the colors date back to the late 1800s. For a few years (1999-2001), the Socceroos went with all green. 


Egypt – 1957

Good reflection of the flag. There were a handful of outliers, including baby blue shirts (?!?!) & all red.


Chile – 1950

Classic play on the colors of the flag. They did have black shorts for 2000-10, though I have no idea why.


Serbia – 1930 

The colors reflect the flag well, though I don’t really care for the sunburst design on the current version


Brazil – 1954

The colors are from the flag, but are lacking its background color, green. Interestingly, there was one year, 1988, where they did rock green shorts.


Peru – 1936

Pretty unique, as far as I can tell. I wonder why no one else has gone with a stripe?


Sweden – 1934 

Good job with the national colors. From 2020-25, though, the team wore black shorts – not totally sure why.


Germany – 1934

Going to get into some more anomalies here, with uniforms not necessarily sharing the colors of the flag. At the same time, though, black and white are the traditional colors of Prussia, were used historically, and so do have some connection.


France – 1930

I would be very disappointed if the tricolor wasn’t reflected here. That said, there was one year, 2003, when they went with blue shorts).


Spain – 1922

Red’s definitely on the Spanish flag. Blue is not. And what happened to yellow? There have been a few years where they tried something different – blue and white (1941-47), blue & light blue (1937) and all red (2014-15).



Italy – 1911

Hey, I thought Italy’s colors were red, green, and white. The blue actually goes all the way back to when Italy was a kingdom and ruled by the house of Savoy, whose color is indeed blue. There have been a few variations over the years, with the team opting for different color shorts – blue and black. The team’s nickname, Gli Azzuri, simply means “the blues” in Italian.


NOTE:  This is the current kit. The database I've been using was all screwed up, Italy-wise.


Uruguay – 1910

I find it kind of interesting that South American teams have kits that go back over a hundred years. That said, soccer was introduced early on by British residing and working in the country. Uruguay, in fact, won the first World Cup, in 1930, and another one in 1950.

The light blue does reflect the flag, though I’m not sure where the black comes from. Over 120 years, there have been only slight variations – white shorts in 1974 and dark blue ones from 1992-96.


Argentina – 1908

The same story goes for Argentina as well. Brits introduced the beautiful game to them in the late 1800s. In fact, the fifth-oldest league in the world was Argentinian, dating back to 1891.

Argentina’s kit is a bit odd, as the country’s flag does not have stripes (though Uruguay’s does!). It does, though, include the light blue. Once again, not totally sure where the black came from. Like Uruguay, they’ve also mixed it up a little with the shorts – grey from 1930-36, and white in 2013-15 and 2023-25.


Hungary – 1902

You may not think of Hungary as a soccer powerhouse, but they do in fact have a long and honored history. They won gold medals in 3 Olympics and were runners-up in the World Cup twice. The kit represents the national colors superbly, with no changes in almost 125 years.


England – 1879

Hey, where are the redcoats? The colors have several explanations. Before 1879, the team wore all white, modelling themselves after cricketeers. (the only other organized team sport at the time). The blue shorts were added to reflect the Football Association’s colors, which are also reflected in the famous three lions crest. Do note, though, that they have gone with all white for 4 of their almost 150 years, including this year.