Friday, May 24, 2019

Best/Worst MLB Uniforms - AL

Baltimore


Good


1966-1974 (more or less)

Classic example of a two-color uni. Notice how well the two colors (and two only please) complement each other.

It also synchs pretty well with the Orioles’ heyday. I’m talking Brooks Robinson, Frank Robinson, Boog Powell, Dave McNally, Jim Palmer, Mike Cuellar ... My family lived there during the time, and the O’s were the first team I cheered for. Heck, I even remember the backup catcher from those lineups (Clay Dalrymple, if you must ask). 

BTW, this is not all that different from the uniforms the team wore for the previous ten years. That one, though, had the full bird logo on the hat, one of the lamer logos there’s ever been. Oddly, they would return to that in 1989, reverting back to the cartoon bird only in 2012.

Bad

1971-1972

Okay, so how did this one sneak in here?  Well, as you can see, this is basically the good uniforms with that horrible orange thing thrown in. The O’s would feature orange tops for a number of years, but never the whole shebang again. And we can all be thankful for that.

Boston


Good

1934-2019

85 years? Wow! They must be doing something right.

Indeed, the simplicity, the old-fashioned lettering, the nice interplay between the two colors … Yup, it just so happens to also be the uniform that Teddy Ballgame, Yaz, Pudge, Big Papi, and all the rest wore as well.

As a certified member of Red Sox Nation (hey, I married into it), I can confidently say, “I approve this uniform.”


Bad

1912-1920

Had to go back a ways for this one. Honestly, though, has there ever been a more boring uniform than that home one? At least the road version lets you know who you’re playing against. I do like those red socks, but honestly guys, you’re going to have to be a little less subtle than that.


White Sox


Good

1982-1986

So, I do usually go for the classics. For the White Sox, though, we’ve got two mitigating factors to deal with here. One, though they did have some good classic unis, they tended to be a little boring, plus they never really stuck with anything that long. Two, this one is actually pretty cool.

Yeah, I know this is straight from the era of excess, but you know, it actually works. It’s not too over the top, the combo of colors is pretty effective, and there is some definite visual interest. This also goes to show that I’m not just an old stick in the mud as well.


Bad

1976-1981 (thereabouts)

Of course, the White Sox were also quite capable of striking out looking with the bases loaded in the bottom of the ninth with two outs and down a run as well.

I couldn’t find a set that actually included shorts, but a little research on the Interwebs tells me that that did indeed happen – in 1976, and only for a single game. And that probably gets my vote for worst uniform ever.

By the way, that all-black number was a genuine throwback. The team wore something similar up to 1916. Musta been nice and comfy in wool.


Cleveland


Good

1946-1950

The Indians sure have tried a bunch of different looks over the years. This is the closest I could get to a classic look that also had a little visual interest as well. A lot of their earlier stuff was very basic and uninteresting. And, for some reason, they immediately reverted to that look right after these.


Bad

1975-1977

You probably know how I feel about solid-color unis at this point. This one, though, may be the worst. If you can find some live shots of these on the Web, they actually look a lot darker – almost burgundy. Thankfully, this only lasted a couple of years.

Another thing that turned me off with these was the lettering. I’m sure it was supposed to reflect Native Americans culture somehow, but it always looked like it came straight out of the Flintstones for me. 


Detroit


Good

1934-2019

Another 85-year-old! This one’s a little different though. It’s super simple, but with one very distinct, defining element – that Gothic D. The whole thing just says Tigers to me. Another real classic.


Bad

1903

Once again, some of those old-timey uniforms were just a little too simple. Basically, we’ve got a big, unadorned D with some differently colored socks and little flash of color on the bill of the home cap. Thank goodness this only lasted a year.


Houston


Good

1965-1970

It’s a tad on the dull side. But considering who we’re talking about here, that is definitely a good thing. They would shake off any sense of nuance or subtlety tout suite.


Bad

1975-1986


These are kind of like an Ed Wood movie – you know, so bad they’re good. There’s probably no better representative of the excesses of the ‘70s and ‘80s than this baby. What were they thinking? Where do I even begin?


Kansas City


Good

1969-1970, 2006-2019


What’s so curious about these are why the team ditched them so soon. Yeah, they’re a tad boring, but they’re pretty classic as well. 

Also, they were the only team at this time who went with that lighter shade of blue. It became something of a signature color for them. Of course, the unis for the next two years were pretty darn similar (the only difference was block letters on the road version). And for the next 30 or so years, the home outfit stayed the same. It was those baby blue away ones that spoiled everything.


Bad

2003-2005

Now, this is not bad at all. It fits in with the overall history, and certainly doesn’t have anything crazy or objectionable about it. All you’ve really got is the cutoff sleeves. Bear with me, though – I had to pick something.


Los Angeles Angels


Good

1965-1970

There was certainly nothing wrong with what followed this (and which lasted for over 20 years). I just think this one has more of a classic look. It would, in fact, be very similar to what the Angels would return to in 1992 (though only for four years). Personally, I always loved the little white stripe around the top of the cap.


Bad

1997-2001

And that’s when they came up with these. To me, it’s just a little too much. Pin stripes? Check. Cut-off sleeves? Got it. Gaudy logo across the chest? Right. Logo repeated on the hat, making it look very minor league? Right.


Minnesota


Good

1961-1975, 1987-2019

Here’s another super-classy, extremely long-lived beauty.  Subtle, nice use of pin stripes – what more can I say? They certainly check all the boxes. 

Wondering what happened in those 10 years in the middle? Honestly, all they did was go with a knit look and no pin stripes, and make the crowns on the home caps red. And that’s why I don’t have a bad uniform for these guys.


New York Yankees


Good

1936-2019

So, here’s another one of those 85-year-olds classics. Something must have been in the air back then.

Hating the Evil Empire as much as I do, I have to – very reluctantly – admit this is probably the best uniform ever. 


Bad

1910

Well, I do recognize the logo on the sleeve. The other stuff is just plain weird, or simply doesn’t fit.


Oakland


Good

1943-1950

No, this was not an Oakland team. Instead, this one dates all the way back to when the A’s were in Philadelphia.

It is very simple, but that may be actually one of its strengths. I also like the classic Gothic A, something that goes back to the team’s second year, way back in 1902. Finally, that shade of blue is pretty unique. Teams tend to go with either a darker or lighter version. Overall, it’s simple, but without being plain at all. Good job.


Bad


1973

Thanks, Charlie Finley. Yup, the guy who brought us orange-colored baseballs, a mule mascot, sheep in the outfield, a designated runner, and the designated hitter also brought us these abominations. 

Color rush unis are bad enough. Yellow and green, though, seem like particularly ill-suited for that treatment.


Seattle


Good

1995-2019

Simple, subtle, but with some visual interest in the unusual (and very Pacific Northwest) colors of green and blue. Honestly, though, these guys really don’t have anything all that exciting.


Bad

1981-1984

It’s really not that offensive, but it’ll have to do. I’m dinging ‘em for the blue roadies, the rather over-done script, and all that stripyness. 

Tampa


Good

2008-2019

Once again, it’s not all that great. But, then again, it’s not all that bad. Honestly, I think that’s all I got to say here.


Bad

1998-2000

This, however, is genuinely bad.  In fact, I’m not sure this illustration does it justice. The major offender, of course, is the color gradient – from blue to yellow – on the very large lettering. It’s just kind of a cheesy touch that was fairly outdated even in 1998. It’s hard to see here, but that treatment extends to the cap as well:

Texas


Good

2000

One thing that’s always struck me about the fans at Rangers game is that half of them are in blue, and half of them are in red. And I think the set above does a good job reflecting that. In fact, I can’t think of another team that has totally different colors for home and away like these. And that’s what makes these interesting, though they are definitely no classics. More like the best of a bad – or mediocre – bunch. 


Bad

1976-1982

Once again, these are not that bad. It’s a different – but effective – treatment for the red and blue. I guess the two things that I’m really dinging ‘em for here are the powder blue road unis and that old-timey font. As for the latter, I do give ‘em some credit for trying, but they come off a slightly cheesy. 


Toronto


Good

2013-2019

I’m starting to sound like a broken record … Once again, a team has gone with something fairly simple, and has managed to – at the very least – not offend.


Bad

1987

These, on the other hand, do manage to offend. First, you’ve got that beer-league softball cap. Next, you’ve got your powder blue road kit. 

And, finally, there’s that big logo on the jerseys. Now, there’s nothing inherently wrong with that. It’s just something that’s not typically done. And, personally, I do think it adds a little more beer-league flavor to the whole ensemble.

Sunday, April 21, 2019

Best/Worst MLB uniforms - NL

Arizona


Good

2007-2014

These guys haven’t really been around long enough, but they have tried a number of different looks. For me, this is the best of a fairly uninspiring bunch. It’s got simplicity going for it, as well as a little bit of interest in the lettering. Personally, I also prefer that logo to the weird A they‘ve also sported (and still have today).


Bad

1998-2000

Purple. Yup, purple. It was a very popular color back in the day. It was popular with the Rockies, and the Ravens, and the Suns, and the Diamond Backs. 

But, what’s with the teal on the hat? Over on the right. Under “Road.” Yup, that was another popular color back from those days way back then. Not sure when – or why – they would have worn those. It doesn’t exactly go with the rest of the ensemble.

Add some pin stripes, the over-busy lettering, and the lack of color contrast between the hat logo and background, and we’ve got a real disaster on our hands.


Atlanta


Good

1966-1967, 1987-1994

A real classic. Used in Milwaukee with just a few minor changes (and in Boston all the way back to 1946), this design very effectively brings back the Golden Age of baseball. Atlanta was actually one of the first teams to return to an older, retro look, in the late 80s. They’ve also used the same style to the present day, by the way, but with a darker road uniform. 
Hard to believe, but Spahn, Matthews, Aaron, Glavine, Smoltz, Maddux, and Chipper Jones all basically wore the same basic outfit.


Bad

1976-1979

Where do I begin? You’ve got your gratuitous pinstripes (they’ve really only looked good on a handful of teams over the years), that weird little thing on the sleeve, and what is perhaps the ultimate beer league softball hat. At least Hank Aaron was spared playing in these (though those Brewer unis were not all that much better).


Cubs


Good

1990-1993, 2001-2019
(1958-1975)

Another real classic. Nice and simple, but with a few details – the pin stripes, the interesting logo on the home uniform, and the cute little cub on the sleeve – that make the whole pretty unique at the same time.

Note that the years in parens are almost the same, but with a few little minor differences. Heck, even the other years in that whole time span weren’t all that different, and really just ring the changes on the same basic pattern. 


Bad

1918

Wow! Where did those come from? Pink is not a color you see on baseball uniforms very often (unless you’re talking about the All-American Girls Professional Baseball League). 

Also, maybe my eyes are deceiving me, but does that guy on the right have green socks? Pink and green might go together on Martha’s Vineyard or Nantucket, but definitely not on a major league baseball field

Finally, the logo on the road jersey looks more like “UBS” than “Cubs” to me. I guess that would make them the company team for the Swiss banking giants then. 


Cincinnati


Good

1968-1992, 2007-2015

Note that this includes their famous polyester version, which they rocked from 1972 to 1992. The only difference was a red collar and belt with double stripes. Those are also the uniforms that Bench, Robinson, Rose, Perez, and all the rest of the Big Red Machine. 

I really like the simplicity here, especially relative to color. And seeing as the team is called the “Reds” …


Bad

1936

The red pants are enough all by themselves, but I do also have to give them (negative) credit for their indecisiveness (are we red, are we blue, are we red-white-and-blue?). Finally, I can’t decide what I dislike the most – that rather busy logo on the shirt, or the teeny, tiny “Reds.” Nothing can top those red pants though.


Colorado


Good / Bad

1993-2019

Well, let’s give ‘em credit. They’ve only been around 30-some years, but they’ve kept the same uniform for the whole time. Further, it’s admirably simple, even though one of their colors is the rather garish purple. And we all know what Arizona did with that color.


Los Angeles Dodgers


Good

1959-2019

Hey, if it ain’t broke … One of the all-time classics, this baby hasn’t changed since the Dodgers moved to LA, about 60 years ago. It’s also basically the same as the Brooklyn Dodgers wore from 1952 to 1958, and from 1938 with a few minor changes. Robinson, Koufax, Drysdale, Lasorda, Sutton, Kershaw …

Simplicity is a plus here, but there are also a few details that really help distinguish these as well. First is the red numbering, a small detail that just screams “Dodgers.” Second is the script. No one else has really done that as well. Finally, the logo on the cap is probably the best one out there.


Bad

1916

Checks? Checks??? Honestly, is this supposed to be gingham? 


Miami


Good

2012-2019

Another team that hasn’t been around that long, the Marlins really don’t have all that much difference between the good and the bad. That said, I really like that color combo. It’s super different, but is nicely underplayed and also makes a nice tie-in to the city (and its Art Deco heritage). It also looks pretty good on the cap logo as well.


Bad

1995-1996

Yup, this one isn’t all that different. And, honestly, all I can really ding ‘em for is the teal on the road caps. There are some good two-color caps out there, but probably not this one. For one thing, I’ve noticed that the more successful of these tend to have the darker color on top. 

To be honest, though, that’s just a quibble. These really aren’t that bad. Pretty much totally forgettable, but definitely not the stuff of nightmares.


Milwaukee



Good

1986-1989


Pretty distinctive (unlike their current unis), but still very much in the realm of good taste. And that’s not something you can say of all Brewer uniforms. I always thought that little logo on their cap was pretty clever (and, once again, a lot more interesting than what they have today). 

1990 to 1993 were almost identical, with script instead of block letters on the home jersey. 


Bad

1995-1996

I was so wanting to put in the two-tone cap and the very blue road uniforms of the 70s and 80s, but this color combo is just so off. Were they channeling the Mariners? And that logo! Usually, I like those intertwined letters (SF, NY, StL …), but this is just kind of a blob.


New York Mets


Good

1961-2019


Hard to believe, but these guys have had only one uniform in their almost-60 years. And it really is a beaut. Nice and simple, but also doing something really interesting with New York baseball history. 

When the Giants and Dodgers left New York in the late 50s, the city was crushed. When the Mets were born a few years later, they combined Dodger blue with the Giants’ orange, logo, and road lettering. 

Hard to believe that Stengel, Seaver, Strawberry, Piazza, David Wright, and Jacob deGrom have all worn the same outfit.  


Philadelphia


Good

1950-1969, 1992-2019


Nice and simple, with plenty of history behind it. Heck, Grover Cleveland Alexander wore something not all that different over 100 years ago. 

In particular, I like the color (especially those little blue dots), the script (repeated on both shirt and cap), and the pinstripes. As for that last bit, I’ve always felt that pinstripes work best with just a single color. You know, like the Yankees?


Bad

1979


Single-color uniforms have a long history in soccer, and are making something of a splash in American football as well. They do not belong on a baseball diamond.

That said, the first uniform is not bad at all. I really like that logo as well. As for the away version, it’s a good example of some of the horrible baby blue stuff teams were wearing in the ’70 and ‘80s when they were on the road. Kansas City, Toronto, and the Expos are all liable here, but I think it clashed in particular with the Phillies’ red. 


Pittsburgh


Good

1970-1975


Hard to believe, but this one dates back to the era of the cookie cutter stadiums. Surprisingly, a couple of other decent uniforms date from that era as well. I’ve already mentioned the Reds, but there were several others than made that polyester work – St. Louis, Minnesota, even the Indians.

For me, I always saw it as the perfect treatment of a two-color scheme. First, there’s that great hat. Then, though, you’ve got those cool stripes repeated at the arms, waist, and ankles. 

I may, though, be a little biased here … My family moved to Pittsburgh when I was a pre-teen around this time. With Maz, Stargell, and of course Roberto, it was definitely a team – and a uniform – you could bond for life with. And I did.


Bad

1977-1979


And then they went to this stuff … What were they thinking? I’ve never seen such a mishmash of styles. From the ol’ timey cap, to the pinstripes, to the solid colors … We used to call them the “bumblebees” and the “canaries.” 


St. Louis


Good

1965-1975, 1985-1991, 2013-2019


This is just such a classic that it makes you wonder what they wore before 1965, between ‘75 and ‘85, and in the early years of this century. To be honest, the differences weren’t all that great. 

The thing with the birds and bat actually goes all the way back to 1922. And those great interlocking letters on the cap go all the way back to 1941. Of course, they were also on a black background until ’65. That was the year that they finally stopped toying around with that second color and committed full-time to red.


Bad

1907-1917


Well, there’s certainly nothing garish about this one. In fact, my main issue here is is it’s just so boring. I’m honestly not sure there’s anything else out there that’s so plain.


San Diego


Good

1985-1990

For the Padres, this one’s pretty simple. The pinstripes, the interesting lettering on the home jersey, and the logo on the road jersey, though, all make this just different enough. 

The Pads went to an all-blue uni in 1991, reflecting the naval history of the city as well as the uniforms of the old minor league team. Tell you the truth, I think those minor league outfits beat anything the Padres later came up with.


Bad

1978


The colors, that cap, the lettering, the all-yellow ensemble … I don’t know, this might be the worst ever.


San Francisco


Good


1958-2019


Much like the Dodgers, the Giants headed West, kept their basic outfit, and never changed it. And that basic outfit dates all the way back to 1933.


Bad

1916


Was this a New York thing? I already shared Brooklyn’s brush with gingham and mismatched colors. I gotta tell you, though, that road uni looks like pajamas.


Washington


Good


2011-2019

Having grown up a Senators fan (me and probably 3 other guys), I was super-excited to see baseball return to DC. Even more so, though, I loved that they finally resurrected those old uniforms.

They're nice and simple, and I love that W. Also, the road uni has just enough difference to make it interesting.

Bad

1908

Are you hot yet? Considering these things were probably all wool, and knowing how hot and sticky summers can be in DC, my heart goes out to these guys. And that includes rookie Walter Johnston. Luckily, he would wear a much lighter uni for the rest of his career here. 


Next week, the AL.

Sunday, April 14, 2019

Best Sports Regions & Cities in the US

I guess there’s a couple of ways you could do this.  I’m thinking of attendance, or maybe TV viewership (or revenue), or perhaps merchandising sales … But, really, what could be simpler than number of major league teams?  So, here we have it, the number of MLB, NFL, NBA, and NHL franchises per city.

Couple of notes:

  • The bigger the circle, the more franchises
  • If your circle’s big enough and completely takes over somebody else’s, I just lump ‘em all together (e.g., Sacramento’s in the Bay Area circle)
  • I debated putting in MLS, but - much as I'd like - I just don’t think we’re quite there yet
  • Sorry – no women’s basketball, lacrosse, rugby, women’s soccer, etc., etc.


So, here's what I'm seein':

  • The Rustbelt, or Industrial Midwest, comes in first (28 franchises), but is rather spread out (from Pittsburgh to Minneapolis, and all the way down to Cincinnati).  Chicago’s the big boy here (with 5), but there also a couple of single-franchise towns (Green Bay and Columbus, OH)
  • NYC is tops for a single city (at 9), but the Northeast Corridor comes in second (23).  I guess they deserve credit, though, for being all on top of each other. From DC to Boston, this is probably the most intensive sports area in the country.
  • California looks like it’s third (with 14), but with only two real nodes, the Bay Area (7) and LA (6).
  • Florida come in fourth (9), with Texas fifth (8).  Overall, the South has 30, with a number of single-franchisers (Raleigh, Memphis, San Antonio, Jacksonville).  I guess you could consider the South first then, but they’re really just too darned spread out for my tastes.
  • Everything else just looks pretty scattered. Phoenix and Denver are pretty good sports towns all by themselves, supporting 4 teams each.  That’s more than the Pacific Northwest (our last real region), with 3 between Seattle and Portland.  Salt Lake City and Oklahoma City, on the other hand, look pretty darn lonely, with both supporting a single NBA team.